347 pages que le législateur (nos ~décideurs~ en matière législative) devrait lire (ou relire)
- http://www.researchoninnovation.org/dopatentswork/
- http://www.researchoninnovation.org/dopatentswork/dopat9.pdf ( les 19 pages ~en_or_massif~ du chapitre 9 : Abstract Patents and Software)
- http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s8634.pdf (les 29 pages du chapitre 1)
- https://tinyurl.com/PatentFailureBessenMeurer
page 10
Sometimes economists quote Machlup (1958) to suggest the futility of attempting to draw broad conclusions about the performance of the patent system: “If we did not have a patent system, it would be irresponsible . . . to recommend instituting one. But since we have had a patent system for a long time, it would be irresponsible, on the basis of our present knowledge, to recommend abolishing it.”
pages du chapitre 9
page 188
Software also seems to be an area with large numbers of relatively obvious patents. For these reasons, it is not surprising that a substantial share of current patent litigation involves software patents.
Are Software Patents Different?
page 189
- AffaireGottschalkBenson à lire au sujet de l'affaire Gottschalk Benson